Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Canadian National Fire Insurance Co. v. Colonsay Hotel Co.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canadian National Fire Insurance Co. v. Colonsay Hotel Co.. Show all posts

Tuesday 30 April 2019

The Colonsay Hotel – Canada’s “Leading Case” in Insurance Valuation Law


The Colonsay Hotel around the time it was built in 1910. Source

The Colonsay Hotel was at the centre of a major insurance case that went all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada in the early 1920s. The Court’s decision, handed down on June 15, 1923, greatly limited the liability of insurance companies on old buildings. It also became known as the “leading case” in Canadian insurance valuation cases.

Built in 1910, the 22-room hotel at Colonsay was sold two years later to John Daley for $20,000. In 1912, even though Colonsay had a population of only 150 people, optimism ran high. At that time, the bars were open, and the sale of liquor was lucrative for the hotel business.

With the advent of Prohibition in 1915, the value of the Colonsay Hotel, as with all Saskatchewan hotels, plummeted dramatically. In 1917, Daley was forced to turn the hotel was over to – ironically – the Saskatchewan Brewing Company to which Daley owed $3,300.

In February 1920, Peter and Rosalina Pura, in partnership with John Lashkewicz, formed the Colonsay Hotel Company and bought the village’s hotel from the brewing company for $3,950. The Puras decided to operate a movie theatre in the hotel and had a $400 addition built. They took out three insurance policies totalling $14,500 – one with the Canadian National Fire Insurance Company for $6,500 on the building and contents; one with the Union Insurance Society of Canton, Limited for $4,000 on the buildings and furniture; and one with the British Crown Assurance Corporation, Limited for $4,000 on the building and contents.

Lashkewicz sold the Puras his half interest in the hotel property on September 20, 1920. Three weeks later, on October 2, 1920, the hotel was destroyed by fire. What resulted, according to newspaper reports, was a lengthy court battle between the hotel owners and the insurance companies. 

Courts Hear Insurance Case

Leader-Post, June 16, 1923
The Puras had insured the hotel at a value that they believed to be the replacement value of the building -- $14,500. After the fire, however, the three insurance companies offered to indemnify the Colonsay Hotel Co. for only $5,100. The owners appealed and were awarded $13,500 by the Court of King’s Bench in Saskatoon.

The insurance companies turned to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, claiming that the original verdict should have been based on the actual value of the hotel at the time of the fire rather than on the cost of replacing the structure. The Court of Appeal maintained the original judge’s verdict and dismissed the appeal with costs.

The insurance companies then took the case to the Supreme Court of
Canada, which rendered its verdict on June 15, 1923. The five judges decided with the insurance companies, stating that the appeal should be allowed. They referred to the Saskatchewan Insurance Act, chapter 84, R.S.S. 1920, section 82 which stated that insurance companies were not liable for loss “beyond the actual value destroyed by fire.” The Supreme Court then ordered a new trial which took place in September 1923.  The insurance companies were eventually awarded $8,000.

The Leading Case in Canada
 
Star-Phoenix, Sept. 22, 1923
According to Marvin G. Baer in his article on insurance law published in the Ottawa Law Review (Winter 1976), “Canadian National Fire Insurance Co. v. Colonsay Hotel Co.” became “the leading case” in Canada for determining actual cash value in property insurance. Baer notes, however, that “Canadian courts have been reluctant to be tied down to any particular test” for valuation. The courts have since used some combination of replacement value less depreciation or market value.

The unique factor in the Colonsay Hotel case, Baer asserts, was the fact that the building’s depreciation in value came about not by physical deterioration, but by “obsolescence caused by external factors.” The external factor in this case was, of course, the closure of the bars. The value of a large hotel in a small town following Prohibition “is an obvious example of the kind of obsolescence which should be considered” when assessing its actual cash value.
 
After the ashes settled, a new, smaller hotel was built in Colonsay which still stands today. It is now called Kobis Bar and Grill.

The Colonsay Hotel, April 2006. Joan Champ photo

©Joan Champ, 2019